MAT — verification

California personal auto generated 2026-10-26 14:46 (Dhaka) ← the rater

Every premium on the rater is computed from a public California filing, and every difference from the incumbent is either explained by a controlled test or reported as unexplained. This page is generated from that evidence at build time: each carrier's tier comes from the result of running its own gate, the reconciliation is the same report docs/ITC-DELTA.md is written from, and the ZIP table is the measurement in fixtures/itc-zip-sweep.json. Nothing here is typed by hand, so a red gate cannot keep a green badge.

7carriers configured
4filed worked examples reproduced
3hand calculations (no filed example)
2Tier C against the incumbent
26ITC observations reconciled
12/12ZIPs measured

1. Tier ladder

A — the carrier's own filing prints a worked example and the gate reproduces it to the cent. B — the filing prints no worked example, so an independent hand calculation of the printed chain is the strongest claim available. C is not a correctness tier: it is the carrier's standing against the incumbent, and it is printed only when a controlled test proves the incumbent's number cannot come from this filing. A red gate is never shown as a tier.

Nations Insurance Company

TIER A
Non-Standard Auto · CDI 25-474
Exhibit 10 - the published worked example — 2,633.00
CDI 25-474, Exhibit 10 (PDF p.561): 8 of 8 coverages, including the printed per-coverage frequency/severity cells
Gatetests/verify.js · 6 checks green
Tier meansthe filing's own worked example reproduces to the cent
BenchmarkTIER C vs ITC
nations-zip-map - ITC's ZIP-to-frequency/severity mapping for this programme is not the mapping printed in class plan 25-474.
Evidence: docs/NATIONS-VINTAGE.md

Aspire General Insurance Company

TIER A
Advantage · CDI 26-340
Exhibit 10 Profile 1 - the Current column — 11,294.63
CDI 24-1046, Exhibit 10 Profile 1 (PDF p.84): 15 printed steps x 5 coverages, 11,274.63 + 20.00 policy fee
Gatetests/aspire.js · 25 checks green
Tier meansthe filing's own worked example reproduces to the cent
BenchmarkNO NAMED CAUSE
under investigation - no controlled test has proven why this carrier differs
Evidence: docs/CARRIER-WORKPLAN.md

Coast National Insurance Company

TIER A
Bristol West BASIC · CDI 24-2324 · CDI 26-486
Example 1 - the manual's own worked risk — 2,243.48
CDI 26-486, Example 1 (PDF pp.463-465): BI 1,237 + PD 983 + policy fee 22.60 + fraud 0.88
Gatetests/coast-example1.js · 8 checks green
Tier meansthe filing's own worked example reproduces to the cent
BenchmarkEXPLAINED DIFFERENCES
coast-liability-level - For this risk ITC prices Bristol West's liability lines at a LEVEL class plan 26-486 does not print: BI x0.9194 and UMBI x0.9150 against the filed computation, the same numbers at two different BI limits, while its PD line follows a published symbol row to within 0.7%. The limit keys and the term are both the filing's, so the disagreement is a level and not a key. coast-uninsured-pd-not-rated - The portal does not rate Uninsured PD for Bristol West on this programme: on every Coast capture its pane prints no UMPD line and the warnings say 'Uninsured PD was not rated by the company.', and the carrier's grid row repeats that sentence inside its own message. MAT prices UMPD 3,500 from 26-486, so part of every Coast total difference is a coverage the portal simply does not sell.
Evidence: docs/CARRIER-WORKPLAN.md

Integon National Insurance Company

TIER B
SUMMIT · CDI 19-2141 + 26-1481
Hand calculation of the printed chain, 7 of 7 coverages — 1,645.07
CDI 19-2141 CP-9 names four example profiles but the Exhibit 10 detail pages are absent from the PDF, and the symbol set is 'sent under separate cover' - so no filed premium exists to reproduce
Gatetests/integon.js · 46 checks green
Tier meansthe filing prints no worked example: an independent hand calculation is the strongest available claim
BenchmarkEXPLAINED DIFFERENCES
integon-club-dent-pro - ITC's Integon (National General Summit) policy fee contains a $36.00 Club Dent Pro membership that class plan 26-1481's fee schedule does not price: the pane prints 52.80, our fee layer charges 16.80 policy fee + 1.76 CA fraud, and 52.80 - 16.80 = 36.00.
Evidence: docs/D2-INTEGON.md

Orion Indemnity Company

TIER B
Orion Indemnity Preferred · CDI 25-2424 (approved 2026-08-05)
Hand calculation of the 20-step order, BI traced step by step — 854.90
CDI 25-2424 (the 10,417-page edition) prints no worked example; the figure is a hand calculation from the printed tables, and 'Round High Dime' is undefined in the filing so ceil-to-dime is the reported default
Gatetests/orion-2026-engine.js · 58 checks green
Tier meansthe filing prints no worked example: an independent hand calculation is the strongest available claim
BenchmarkTIER C vs ITC
orion-rate-level - ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit. orion-per-coverage-split - Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
Evidence: docs/CARRIER-WORKPLAN.md

Nations Insurance Company (Bluefire MGA programme)

TIER B
Nations Personal Auto - Bluefire (NIC-BF-CA-PPA) · CDI 23-581 (effective 2023-05-01)
Hand calculation of all 8 coverages on six risks — 1,403.00
CDI 23-581 prints no worked example; 8 of 8 coverages agree to the dollar on six risks, demo risk 1,403
Gatetests/bluefire-engine.js · 42 checks green
Tier meansthe filing prints no worked example: an independent hand calculation is the strongest available claim
BenchmarkNOT QUOTED
its own programme, not a Nations setting: nine of twelve class tables differ, but 23-581 prints its own approved base rates (p.106 Prior/Proposed, p.155, p.241 Exhibit 15) and they are arithmetically the class plan's current column, so driven through 25-474's 30/60 ladder it reproduces Nations Insurance Company to the cent (832.00 on both sides of ITC's 40504877 risk, where the portal prints 1003.00) - a second card would print Nations' money. ITC shows Bluefire 16.7% below Nations (BI 485 / PD 410 / UMBI 108 against 582 / 482 / 130), and no California filing we hold prices that. See docs/BLUEFIRE-FINDINGS.md
Evidence: docs/BLUEFIRE.md

Aegis Security Insurance Company

TIER A
Shield (Triton General programme) · CDI 25-2112 + 25-2240 (effective 2026-08-03)
Exhibit 10 Example 1 — 5,229.99
CDI 25-2112, Exhibit 10 Example 1: 1,825.90 + 2,276.45 + 497.27 + 475.34 + 119.03 = 5,229.99 including the printed 36.00 policy fee
Gatetests/aegis-engine.js · 52 checks green
Tier meansthe filing's own worked example reproduces to the cent
BenchmarkEXPLAINED DIFFERENCES
aegis-fraud-assessment - ITC's Diam total includes a CA fraud assessment that 25-2112's filed Fee Schedule does not print: 0.88 on a six-month policy, 1.75 annual. The term pair measured on 2026-10-25 (Dhaka) shows the portal carries it at BOTH terms - the constant is 38.68, which is the printed 28.80 policy fee + 9.00 SR-22 filing fee + 0.88, where a pro-rated 0.88/1.75 split would give 37.81 - so on an annual quote the portal adds 0.88, not 1.75.
Evidence: docs/AEGIS-SHIELD-FINDINGS.md

2. Reconciliation against the incumbent

Every ITC number on disk, priced through the same bundle the browser runs (adapters + fee layer), with the difference stated. The verdict describes whether our number lands on the portal's; the cause describes why it does not. A cause is attached only when fixtures/itc-causes.json carries a proven record for that carrier, so "unexplained with a named cause" is a precise statement, and a priced difference with no record says under investigation. A refusal is a fact about the filing, not a zero.

observationcarrier shownITCMAT differenceverdictcause
rahman-nations Nations Insurance Company 1,276.87 1,620.75 +343.88
+26.93%
UNEXPLAINED nations-zip-map
ITC's ZIP-to-frequency/severity mapping for this programme is not the mapping printed in class plan 25-474.
nations-mileage-bands
The portal does not rate an annual mileage below 15,501 for this programme: an entry at 10,000 or 12,000 miles prices the 15,501 band and says so in a warning (Risk was rated at 15501 miles), so the flat stretch from 5,000 to 15,000 is a FLOOR, not a missing table. 25-474 prints a separate factor for every 500-mile band and requires +40.7% across that stretch.
rahman-coast Bristol West 2,493.55 2,547.10 +53.55
+2.15%
UNEXPLAINED coast-liability-level
For this risk ITC prices Bristol West's liability lines at a LEVEL class plan 26-486 does not print: BI x0.9194 and UMBI x0.9150 against the filed computation, the same numbers at two different BI limits, while its PD line follows a published symbol row to within 0.7%. The limit keys and the term are both the filing's, so the disagreement is a level and not a key.
rahman-aspire Aspire no total 2,624.28 -
NO_PORTAL_NUMBER the portal printed no total for this carrier, so there is nothing to reconcile
rahman-integon National General (Summit) 1,211.56 1,172.08 -39.48
-3.26%
UNEXPLAINED integon-club-dent-pro
ITC's Integon (National General Summit) policy fee contains a $36.00 Club Dent Pro membership that class plan 26-1481's fee schedule does not price: the pane prints 52.80, our fee layer charges 16.80 policy fee + 1.76 CA fraud, and 52.80 - 16.80 = 36.00.
rahman-orion Orion Indemnity 1,236.80 2,273.40 +1,036.60
+83.81%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
rahman-bluefire Bluefire - Nations - NIC 1,052.75 refused -
REFUSED bluefire-limit-3060
The portal priced BI 30/60 for Bluefire in October 2026; 23-581 files BI 15/30 and PD $10,000 only.
rahman-aegis Triton General - Diam 1,134.62 2,246.48 +1,111.86
+97.99%
UNEXPLAINED aegis-fraud-assessment
ITC's Diam total includes a CA fraud assessment that 25-2112's filed Fee Schedule does not print: 0.88 on a six-month policy, 1.75 annual. The term pair measured on 2026-10-25 (Dhaka) shows the portal carries it at BOTH terms - the constant is 38.68, which is the printed 28.80 policy fee + 9.00 SR-22 filing fee + 0.88, where a pro-rated 0.88/1.75 split would give 37.81 - so on an annual quote the portal adds 0.88, not 1.75.
diam-aegis Triton General - Diam 645.81 644.92 -0.89
-0.14%
NEAR aegis-fraud-assessment
ITC's Diam total includes a CA fraud assessment that 25-2112's filed Fee Schedule does not print: 0.88 on a six-month policy, 1.75 annual. The term pair measured on 2026-10-25 (Dhaka) shows the portal carries it at BOTH terms - the constant is 38.68, which is the printed 28.80 policy fee + 9.00 SR-22 filing fee + 0.88, where a pro-rated 0.88/1.75 split would give 37.81 - so on an annual quote the portal adds 0.88, not 1.75.
mukul-nations Nations Insurance Company 1,256.87 889.75 -367.12
-29.21%
UNEXPLAINED nations-zip-map
ITC's ZIP-to-frequency/severity mapping for this programme is not the mapping printed in class plan 25-474.
nations-mileage-bands
The portal does not rate an annual mileage below 15,501 for this programme: an entry at 10,000 or 12,000 miles prices the 15,501 band and says so in a warning (Risk was rated at 15501 miles), so the flat stretch from 5,000 to 15,000 is a FLOOR, not a missing table. 25-474 prints a separate factor for every 500-mile band and requires +40.7% across that stretch.
mukul-nations-floor Nations Insurance Company (both sides at the portal's 15,501-mile floor) 1,256.87 1,185.75 -71.12
-5.66%
UNEXPLAINED nations-zip-map
ITC's ZIP-to-frequency/severity mapping for this programme is not the mapping printed in class plan 25-474.
mukul-bluefire Bluefire - Nations - NIC 1,032.75 refused -
REFUSED bluefire-limit-3060
The portal priced BI 30/60 for Bluefire in October 2026; 23-581 files BI 15/30 and PD $10,000 only.
mukul-coast-40525544 Bristol West (rated at a 6-month term) 1,246.96 1,220.92 -26.04
-2.09%
UNEXPLAINED coast-liability-level
For this risk ITC prices Bristol West's liability lines at a LEVEL class plan 26-486 does not print: BI x0.9194 and UMBI x0.9150 against the filed computation, the same numbers at two different BI limits, while its PD line follows a published symbol row to within 0.7%. The limit keys and the term are both the filing's, so the disagreement is a level and not a key.
coast-uninsured-pd-not-rated
The portal does not rate Uninsured PD for Bristol West on this programme: on every Coast capture its pane prints no UMPD line and the warnings say 'Uninsured PD was not rated by the company.', and the carrier's grid row repeats that sentence inside its own message. MAT prices UMPD 3,500 from 26-486, so part of every Coast total difference is a coverage the portal simply does not sell.
mukul-integon-40525544 National General Summit 1,223.56 834.10 -389.46
-31.83%
UNEXPLAINED integon-club-dent-pro
ITC's Integon (National General Summit) policy fee contains a $36.00 Club Dent Pro membership that class plan 26-1481's fee schedule does not price: the pane prints 52.80, our fee layer charges 16.80 policy fee + 1.76 CA fraud, and 52.80 - 16.80 = 36.00.
mukul-integon-40525596-pd25000 National General Summit 1,238.56 844.24 -394.32
-31.84%
UNEXPLAINED integon-club-dent-pro
ITC's Integon (National General Summit) policy fee contains a $36.00 Club Dent Pro membership that class plan 26-1481's fee schedule does not price: the pane prints 52.80, our fee layer charges 16.80 policy fee + 1.76 CA fraud, and 52.80 - 16.80 = 36.00.
mukul-orion-40525596 Orion Indemnity Company (the carrier itself forces a 6-month term) 605.88 835.00 +229.12
+37.82%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
mukul-orion-40525596-bi50100 Orion Indemnity Company (the carrier forces the 6-month term AND substitutes the PD limit) 654.48 899.00 +244.52
+37.36%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
mukul-orion-40525596-bi100300 Orion Indemnity Company (6-month term forced, PD limit substituted 15,000 -> 50,000) 732.18 1,003.60 +271.42
+37.07%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
mukul-orion-40525596-pd25000 Orion Indemnity Company (6-month term forced by the carrier; PD held INSIDE its printed BI) 627.28 862.30 +235.02
+37.47%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
purvis-aspire Aspire General Insurance Company 2,059.61 2,349.08 +289.47
+14.05%
UNEXPLAINED under investigation - no controlled test has established a cause
lopez-coast Bristol West 846.96 1,030.68 +183.72
+21.69%
UNEXPLAINED coast-liability-level
For this risk ITC prices Bristol West's liability lines at a LEVEL class plan 26-486 does not print: BI x0.9194 and UMBI x0.9150 against the filed computation, the same numbers at two different BI limits, while its PD line follows a published symbol row to within 0.7%. The limit keys and the term are both the filing's, so the disagreement is a level and not a key.
mukul-coast-40525596-terr90210 Bristol West (6-month term forced by the carrier) 1,864.96 1,769.92 -95.04
-5.10%
UNEXPLAINED coast-liability-level
For this risk ITC prices Bristol West's liability lines at a LEVEL class plan 26-486 does not print: BI x0.9194 and UMBI x0.9150 against the filed computation, the same numbers at two different BI limits, while its PD line follows a published symbol row to within 0.7%. The limit keys and the term are both the filing's, so the disagreement is a level and not a key.
mukul-integon-40525596-terr90210 National General Summit 1,843.56 1,257.24 -586.32
-31.80%
UNEXPLAINED integon-club-dent-pro
ITC's Integon (National General Summit) policy fee contains a $36.00 Club Dent Pro membership that class plan 26-1481's fee schedule does not price: the pane prints 52.80, our fee layer charges 16.80 policy fee + 1.76 CA fraud, and 52.80 - 16.80 = 36.00.
mukul-orion-40525596-terr90210 Orion Indemnity Company (6-month term forced by the carrier; PD held INSIDE its printed BI) 721.98 988.50 +266.52
+36.92%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
mukul-coast-40525596-married Bristol West (6-month term forced by the carrier) 1,069.96 1,057.92 -12.04
-1.13%
NEAR coast-liability-level
For this risk ITC prices Bristol West's liability lines at a LEVEL class plan 26-486 does not print: BI x0.9194 and UMBI x0.9150 against the filed computation, the same numbers at two different BI limits, while its PD line follows a published symbol row to within 0.7%. The limit keys and the term are both the filing's, so the disagreement is a level and not a key.
mukul-integon-40525596-married National General Summit 1,171.56 799.30 -372.26
-31.77%
UNEXPLAINED integon-club-dent-pro
ITC's Integon (National General Summit) policy fee contains a $36.00 Club Dent Pro membership that class plan 26-1481's fee schedule does not price: the pane prints 52.80, our fee layer charges 16.80 policy fee + 1.76 CA fraud, and 52.80 - 16.80 = 36.00.
mukul-orion-40525596-married Orion Indemnity Company (6-month term forced by the carrier) 473.58 650.00 +176.42
+37.25%
UNEXPLAINED orion-rate-level
ITC prices Orion Indemnity at a rate level class plan 25-2424 does not print: with the portal's own fee removed, its premium is 72.5%-75.0% of the filed computation, and that gap does not move with the ZIP or with the BI limit.
orion-per-coverage-split
Orion's difference is coverage-specific and not one rate level: at the entry its own pane prints (6-month term, 10,000 annual miles) the portal's Uninsured lines land near HALF our computation - UMBI x0.5800, UMPD x0.5321 - while its liability line lands ABOVE it, BI x1.4287 (or, on the reading that the printed 'Incl.' PD sits inside the BI figure, BI+PD x0.7608). No single multiplier reproduces the four lines in either reading, and the quote total reaches 72.46% of ours (72.56% with the portal's 0.88 fee) by cancellation: the liability line is 42.9% ABOVE our BI and the Uninsured pair 42.0% and 46.8% BELOW our UMBI and UMPD. The BI figure is an ENTRY READING and not a carrier constant: because it carries PD inside it, it reads x1.5007 when only the PD limit moves at an unchanged 30/60 BI and x1.2925 at 100/300, while the bundle (BI+PD against our BI+PD at the limit the carrier rated) stays at 0.7608 / 0.7617 / 0.7585 - a spread of 0.0032 across three entries, with PD at 48.0-48.1% of the printed BI solved twice from independent steps. The PD limit itself is the carrier's key, not the difference: on a 15,000 -> 25,000 step the printed BI moves by 25-2424's PD factor scaled by a PD share that is now 48.0-48.2% from three independent steps, and the Uninsured pair does not move at all.
0 of 26 observations are exact. 1 priced difference has no proven cause and is reported as under investigation rather than explained away. 1 observation carries no portal total at all.

3. The ZIP territory measurement

One identical risk, one quote per ZIP, the Nations premium read off the comparison grid. 25-474 prints one frequency and one severity column shared by BI/PD/UM/UMPD, so the total between two ZIPs must move by a factor inside the interval the four per-coverage ratios span — whatever the coverage mix is. No weights, no key.

ZIPfiled band (BI)ITC premium portal / calibrationfiling requiresverdict
90012
1001 N Alameda St
19/19 1,716.87 1.3660x 1.9625–1.9685x OUTSIDE the filed band
90036
201 S Martel Ave
19/19 1,706.87 1.3580x 1.9625–1.9685x OUTSIDE the filed band
90045
6401 W 81st St
18/20 1,948.87 1.5506x 1.4649–1.4694x OUTSIDE the filed band
90250
4339 W 129th St
18/14 1,770.87 1.4090x 1.1588–1.1624x OUTSIDE the filed band
90401
1431 7th St
18/20 1,792.87 1.4265x 1.4649–1.4694x OUTSIDE the filed band
90802
300 E Ocean Blvd
16/11 1,422.87 1.1321x 1.0000–1.0000x OUTSIDE the filed band
90806
2201 Atlantic Ave
16/11 1,256.87 1.0000x 1.0000–1.0000x calibration
91710
13640 Benson Ave
6/11 1,076.87 0.8568x 0.8794–0.8821x OUTSIDE the filed band
92101
2001 Pan American Plaza
7/10 970.87 0.7725x 0.8592–0.8618x OUTSIDE the filed band
92501
4121 Mission Inn Ave
5/12 1,054.87 0.8393x 0.8970–0.8997x OUTSIDE the filed band
92618
195 Stellar
6/13 1,180.87 0.9395x 0.9684–0.9713x OUTSIDE the filed band
92701
818 E 3rd St
13/11 1,242.87 0.9889x 0.9909–0.9970x OUTSIDE the filed band
92806
2644 E Hempstead Cir
6/13 1,144.87 0.9109x 0.9431–0.9684x OUTSIDE the filed band
12 of 12 required ZIPs measured, plus the 90806 calibration point — the sweep is complete. Every point is a measured Nations row from ITC's comparison grid, and nothing is interpolated between them. Route 1 of the three named options: a browser session on a persistent Chromium profile instead of a harness that relaunches Chromium per crash. The Carrier Selection postback no longer kills the session outright, and when it does kill the process the saved quote and the same profile let the next ZIP be re-entered in about three minutes instead of a fresh login plus 30 fields. The crash is intermittent, not fixed: eight of the twelve points needed exactly one attempt, and the browser process still dies on Carrier Selection often enough that every point is written to disk the moment it is read.